![]() ![]() ![]() MS decided to do the same with NT as Windows-95 because, as we all know, W-95 was a rock solid piece of wonderware that proved kernel-mode drivers were a brilliant idea that should have conferred instant saint-hood on whoever came up with it. "I remember there was quite an uproar about stability when NT4 came out with kernel-mode graphics drivers." This could be one of those cases where such and so feature is supported correctly in some hardware and not others, so the spec might say doing certain things are kosher and they test fine on the hardware you've got, then you find out that there's a lot of people with systems with broken system hardware or drivers. Obviously Apple's driver initiates it, but it doesn't mean that's what's crashing. In any case older versions of windows don't support user mode drivers and not all Windows XP installations have the user mode framework.Īt this point, we don't know where the BSOD coming from yet. If that's the case, Microsoft deserves a pat on the back for providing a framework for user mode drivers and a kick in the pants for making the framework totally incompatible. So it's possible that it's got direct access because that's the old default and they'd have to rewrite it. ![]() "Doesn't need" is not the same as "doesn't use." IIRC, if you want to port a kernel mode driver to the user mode driver framework in Windows, the path of least resistance is to rewrite it from plain old function oriented C to C++ with COM. The filesystem, for example - Minix has a non-threaded filesystem Linux had a threaded filesystem. In fact, that's one of several other ways Minix took performance hits - ways that I'd call bad design. Linux could do everything Minix could, and it already ran in native 32-bit mode (which Minix needed patches for). Or you could spend that same money on a faster computer (a 386), and get Linux for free. And then install the source code, and download a number of patches needed to get something approximating a modern OS, recompile, and reinstall. The best argument at the time was: You could spend the money and buy Minix, and install it. Linus admitted that he never expected Linux to be much more than a stopgap until GNU/HURD was released - except that HURD took too long to get any kind of release out the door, so Linux already had adoption at that point. I think the main reason no one had an interest in Minix was the cost, and the restrictive licensing. To wrap it up, SharePod can considerably reduce the hassle when managing iPod content, and its freeware license recommends this utility to any iPod user.One of the big reasons no one had any interest in minix is the incredible performance hit the design entails. In addition to copying and moving multimedia files, SharePod can also create Winamp playlists from a source iPod allowing users to listen to the corresponding tracks on the PC without having to copy the files. Else, it would miss the whole idea of a portable, light, easy-to-use application. The software does not have any special features, but it does not need them either. What sets this software apart from other similar ones is the fact that it doesn't require any installation, and if a user is sharing their iPod over a network, then other people can run the same SharePod executable they are using, and download music straight from their iPod.Īll this is done by simply plugging the iPod into the computer and running SharePod. It can be used for photos as well, so you can finally enjoy slideshows with your favorite pics on your iPod. It is a small iPod tool that can be used to easily move music from the iPod to the computer, and the other way around. The ideal software is a portable one, small in size, that requires little PC resources and does its work fast - such as SharePod. ![]() They may seem reliable, but they may also cause issues to your computer. IPod owners are already aware that in order to copy files to their device, dedicated software is required. Since Apple has a large market share in this area, more and more iPod users need to find ways to transfer their favorite tracks from their Windows computers to their device. Technology has evolved a lot in the music department, with people switching from CD players to MP3 players and iPods. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |